Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7406767
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T05:36:27+00:00 2026-05-29T05:36:27+00:00

I have a very simple (sample) C program as follows. I want to ensure

  • 0

I have a very simple (sample) C program as follows. I want to ensure I release any resources necessary so that valgrind does not complain. Do I need to free mutex1? Or do anything before the program terminates? Or is the mutex1 not allocate memory?

02  pthread_mutex_t mutex1 = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
03  int counter=0;
04   
05  /* Function C */
06  void functionC()
07  {
08     pthread_mutex_lock( &mutex1 );
09     counter++
10     pthread_mutex_unlock( &mutex1 );
11  }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T05:36:27+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 5:36 am

    No, it is fine as it is. It is not necessary to use pthread_mutex_destroy on a statically allocated mutex.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a very simple program that I am trying to improve performance. One
I have a very very simple program that parses a csv file that has
I have created a very simple program that uses recursion. I'm using the g++
I have a very simple program that consists of a .NET 2.0 exe (Program.exe)
I have a very simple test program, running on Solaris 5.8: #include <stdio.h> #include
Have a look at this very simple example WPF program: <Window x:Class=WpfApplication1.Window1 xmlns=http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation xmlns:x=http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml
i have very simple problem. I need to create model, that represent element of
I have a very simple bit of script that changes the status of an
I have a very simple Java RMI Server that looks like the following: import
I have very simple C program: int foobar(int a) { int b = a;

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.