Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3438052
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T08:08:25+00:00 2026-05-18T08:08:25+00:00

I have a web app that is used on multiple continents. The underlying transaction

  • 0

I have a web app that is used on multiple continents. The underlying transaction DB is locking up when large reports are run. I want to:

  1. make a realtime of the SQL Server 2005 database to a reports DB
  2. direct all reporting to the reports DB

In theory this will prevent transaction locking for inserts and updates. It is OK if the reports DB gets locked temporarily as long as the transactions continue. The reports DB can receive the new transactions when it is under a lighter load. What is the best way to maintain a near realtime copy of the transaction DB? Should I use replication, mirroring or a combination of the two? What general guidelines I should follow?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T08:08:25+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 8:08 am

    Use Sql Server replication for implementing this kind of architecture. E.g. replicate data from your main db server to the reporting server. It’s not quite real time (few systems are) but can be very close.

    There are several flavors with Sql Server replication and you’ll probably want server-to-server. Also see this article about data warehousing and reporting. It describes the exact scenario that you’re up against and your goals:

    By design, transactional replication
    addresses the principal requirements
    for this scenario:

    • Transactional consistency
    • Low latency
    • High Throughput
    • Minimal overhead
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.