Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 776183
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T19:24:35+00:00 2026-05-14T19:24:35+00:00

I have a weird Java question: As we know: All Java classes extend java.lang.Object

  • 0

I have a weird Java question:

As we know:

  1. All Java classes extend java.lang.Object
  2. All Java classes cannot extend itself

Then, java.lang.Object must extend java.lang.Object, which is itself, therefore, it should be impossible. How is Object implemented in Java?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T19:24:36+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 7:24 pm

    Object is an exception to the first rule, and has no superclass. From JLS3 8.1.4:

    The extends clause must not appear in the definition of the class Object, because it is the primordial class and has no direct superclass.

    You can also try it out with reflection:

    Object.class.getSuperclass(); // returns null
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a weird problem. While running my Android application, I receive Exception: java.lang.ClassCastException:
My question is that I have an object class( packet) which contains another object
I have a weird problem with a Java Gregorian Calendar: SimpleDateFormat sdf = new
I have a weird question. After profiling my code several times with NYTProf. I
I have another weird problem which I have not been able to solve in
This is a simple question: I know and have heard from almost everyone that
I have a WEIRD problem with Future.get() in Java. It returns always with an
This is kind of a weird question. I'd like to write a Java function
I have weird problem. I'm using Eclipse for writing J2EE (java, jsf, javascript) application
I have a weird problem. My java applet work fine in my IDE (Eclipse),

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.