Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 575039
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T13:53:43+00:00 2026-05-13T13:53:43+00:00

I have a working one to many relationship (NOT bbidirectional) where Resource has a

  • 0

I have a working one to many relationship (NOT bbidirectional) where Resource has a set of many Allocations implented as shown below. The domain needs to do more with the collection of allocations that just manage it with AddAllocation, RemoveAllocation, etc. So from an object perspective, I’d like to put that extra logic that is not persistent related into a different class, AllocationCollection, and make that extra class transparent to NHib.

I’d also like to flesh out the responibilities of the AllocationCollection in a TDD manner, but I’m not sure how to refactor the existing class so NHib still works, mapping wise. How would you do that?

Cheers,
Berryl

MODEL

public class Resource {

    public virtual ICollection<Allocation> Allocations
    {
        get { return _allocations ?? (_allocations = new HashSet<Allocation>()); }
        private set { _allocations = value; } // Nhib will use this
    }
}

MAPPING

<hibernate-mapping xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2" ...
<class xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2" name="Domain.Model.Resources.Resource, ... table="Resources">
....
<set cascade="all-delete-orphan" name="Allocations">
  <key foreign-key="Allocations_Resource_FK">
    <column name="ResourceId" />
  </key>
  <one-to-many class="Model.Allocations.Allocation, ... />
</set>

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T13:53:43+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 1:53 pm

    Billy McCafferty has an excellent series of articles on working with custom collections in NHibernate. Personally I no longer use custom collection types. I control collection access from the class containing the collection (i.e. aggregate root) with AddMyType, RemoveMyType, etc., methods. I expose the collection as IEnumerable<MyType>. I’ve replaced other custom collection accessors with extension methods on IEnumerable<MyType>.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a layout that is working, but it has one very annoying problem..
One long term project I have is working through all the exercises of SICP.
I'm working in VS 2008 and have three projects in one solution. I'm debugging
I have a small application I am working on that at one point needs
I'm working on a code base in which we have several configurable types. One
I'm working on a C# program, and right now I have one Form and
I have been working on a web services related project for about the last
I have been working with Visual Studio (WinForm and ASP.NET applications using mostly C#)
I have been working with a string[] array in C# that gets returned from
We have been working with CVS for years, and frequently find it useful to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.