Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3360858
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T03:03:13+00:00 2026-05-18T03:03:13+00:00

I have an abstract class that defines some methods. This class has two subclasses.

  • 0

I have an abstract class that defines some methods. This class has two subclasses.

Should I create a fake subclass just for testing, or should I test the methods through the subclasses’ tests? Testing through the subclasses seems more natural, but then I’d have to duplicate the test code between the 2 subclasses’ tests.

What do you guys think?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T03:03:14+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 3:03 am

    You don’t have to duplicate your test code – you can write your test methods so that they accept a parameter.

    Since most test frameworks don’t support tests that take parameters you can add a little wrapper that calls your parameterized test method with a specific instance. You can now easily choose whether it makes sense to call your test just once with some specific base class, or have multiple tests of the same method – one test for each of the possible base classes. Since only a thin wrapper needs to be added for each new test, there is very little code duplication.

    void TestSomething(AbstractClass foo)
    {
        // Your test code goes here.
        Assert.AreEqual(42, foo.Bar());
    }
    
    [Test]
    void TestSomethingFoo1()
    {
        TestSomething(new Foo1());
    }
    
    [Test]
    void TestSomethingFoo2()
    {
        TestSomething(new Foo2());
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Ok so I have an abstract base class called Product, a KitItem class that
If I have a base class such that public abstract class XMLSubscription <T extends
I have a collection of classes that inherit from an abstract class I created.
In my domain model I have an abstract class CommunicationChannelSpecification, which has child classes
I have an abstract Class Monitor.java which is subclassed by a Class EmailMonitor.java .
I have an abstract class and I would like to use it quickly by
I have an abstract base class with a TcpClient field: public abstract class ControllerBase
I have an abstract class: type TInterfaceMethod = class abstract public destructor Destroy; virtual;
I have an abstract class defining a pure virtual method in c++: class Base
Can an abstract class have a constructor? If so, how can it be used

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.