Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 541027
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T10:18:04+00:00 2026-05-13T10:18:04+00:00

I have an abstract virtual base class Foo from which I derive many other

  • 0

I have an abstract virtual base class Foo from which I derive many other classes that differ in small ways. I have a factory that creates the derived classes and returns Foo*. One of my bigger problems is in my operator overloads, I need to make sure that the DFoo does not get operated on by DFoo1 (not shown). I have currently handled this with checking if a cast fails, but I’m pretty unhappy with that approach. I have to use the base implementation, because I only can return the base class from the factory. If this is the best way to do it, that’s fine, I just want to make sure that this makes sense and that there isn’t a pattern I’m missing. Any suggestions about how to handle this sort of thing are very much appreciated.

 class Foo
 {
    public:
          Foo(int x){...};
          Bar m_bar;
          virtual Foo& operator=(const Foo& f)
          {
             m_bar = f.m_bar
          }
 }

Now, my derived class

class DFoo : public Foo
{
     DFoo(int x, int y):Foo(int x) {...}
     FooBar m_foobar;

     Foo& operator=(const Foo& rhs)
     {
        if(this != &rhs)
        {

              Foo::operator=(rhs);
              DFoo temp = static_cast<DFoo>(rhs);

              if(temp != NULL)
              {
                m_foobar = static_cast<DFoo>(rhs).m_foobar;
              }
              else
                 throw exception(ex);
        }
     }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T10:18:04+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:18 am

    You are probably looking for boost::noncopyable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 291k
  • Answers 291k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you are on a multicore machine, you might check… May 13, 2026 at 6:01 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you have a Mac, it's fairly easy, because Apache… May 13, 2026 at 6:01 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer That is not possible with mod_rewrite. You would need some… May 13, 2026 at 6:01 pm

Related Questions

I cannot figure this out. I need to have an abstract template base class,
I have an abstract base class which acts as an interface. I have two
I have an abstract class in my DLL. class Base { virtual char *
I have an abstract class: type TInterfaceMethod = class abstract public destructor Destroy; virtual;
I have an abstract class defining a pure virtual method in c++: class Base

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.