Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6382933
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T02:35:13+00:00 2026-05-25T02:35:13+00:00

I have an action that takes POST data secured by sfGuard. This means that

  • 0

I have an action that takes POST data secured by sfGuard. This means that if the user is not logged in, the POST data will be sent to the log in form. Ordinarily, this is not a problem, the user continues to log in, and has to submit the data again.

Unfortunately, the log in form seems to be using the POST data as if it was submitted with the form itself. This means that it is complaining that the required username and password fields are missing, and it complains that it is missing a CSRF token. This last problem does not go away, after submitting the form, meaning the user cannot log in, anyway.

The user should not be presented with the form if not logged in, but it might be possible for the user to log out with the form still open. So I am asking in the interest of keeping the interface watertight and error-free.

Is this a shortcoming of sfGuard, can it be avoided, or am I doing something wrong altogether?

To clarify, the route looks like this:

add_subgroup:
  url:      /group/:id/add
  class:    sfPropelRoute
  options:
    model:  Group
    type:   object
  param:    { module: subgroups, action: create }
  requirements:
    group_id: \d+
    sf_method: [post]

The form used to submit the request is as follows:

<form action="<?php echo url_for('add_subgroup', $group) ?>" method="post">
  <input type="hidden" name="group_id" value="<?php echo $group->getId() ?>" />
  <input type="text" name="subgroup_id" />
  <input type="submit" class="button" value="Add" />
</form>
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T02:35:14+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 2:35 am

    It is a shortcoming of sfGuard, because the signin action will check for a POST request, and if so bind the form.

    From the code in BasesfGuardActions.class.php:

    if ($request->isMethod('post'))
    {
      $this->form->bind($request->getParameter('signin'));
    

    I’m personally not a big fan of forwarding between actions in symfony, and just like in this case, I think it’s more appropriate to redirect than forward. This also solves your problem because this will result in a new GET request. You can accomplish this behavior by extending sfGuardBasicSecurityFilter.

    class mySecurityFilter extends sfGuardBasicSecurityFilter
    {
    
      protected function forwardToLoginAction()
      {
        $context = $this->getContext();
        // If you want to redirect back to the original URI (note: original POST data will be lost)
        $context->getUser()->setReferer($context->getRequest()->getUri());
        $url = sfConfig::get('sf_login_module') . '/' . sfConfig::get('sf_login_action');
        $context->getController()->redirect($url);
        throw new sfStopException();
      }
    
    }
    

    Now in app/myapp/config/filters.yml

    security:
      class: mySecurityFilter
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm kind of confused... I have one action that takes an ID, loads up
I have multiple controller actions that takes an id public ActionResult Get(int? id) {
I have a controller action that is being executed by a link that was
I have a form action that needs to have its value set from a
I have an ASP.NET MVC project and I have a single action that accepts
I have a HTML form, and I have a Controller Action that accepts the
I have a custom installer action that updates the PATH environment, and creates an
I have an action called List that shows the results of a search. It
If I have an ASP.NET MVC controller action that is called from a jQuery
I have an ASP.NET MVC project with a form. In the Action method that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.