Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6727109
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T10:00:33+00:00 2026-05-26T10:00:33+00:00

I have an ActiveX on a page… I know … ActiveX … blarghhh! That

  • 0

I have an ActiveX on a page… I know … ActiveX … blarghhh!

That for some logic business reason we had to go with ActiveX, but the problem is that I can’t make the ActiveX <object> to be beneath anything else …

it’s extremely weird!

Live plain example and Live example with iframe wrapper

You can try the example, but remember that the ActiveX only work in Internet Explorer, and no matter what version for the ActiveX, it will always run.

This problem I’m facing is the overlapping one:

enter image description here

Playing with position and z-index does nothing and I have no more ideas 🙁

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T10:00:33+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 10:00 am

    ActiveX controls are rendered as “windowed” elements in Internet Explorer, whereas most other elements (particularly in newer versions of IE) are “windowless”. Flash has a wmode option for whether it draws windowless or windowed but, in my experience, this is very difficult to achieve, especially if the object is written in .NET and not C++.

    All windowed elements paint themselves on top of all windowless
    elements, despite the wishes of their container. However, windowed
    elements do follow the z-index attribute with respect to each other,
    just as windowless elements follow the z-index attribute with respect
    to each other.

    All windowless elements are rendered on the same MSHTML plane, and
    windowed elements draw on a separate MSHTML plane. You can use z-index
    to manipulate elements on the same plane but not to mix and match with
    elements in different planes. You can rearrange the z-indexing of the
    elements on each plane, but the windowed plane always draws on the top
    of the windowless plane.

    > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/177378

    There are two potential solutions I can think of. You could try the iframe “cutout” solution, which explains that you can use iframes to “cut out” part of the plug-in for the HTML below to show through.

    The second solution is to draw your popup menus in a popup object. These are separate windows that render in front of your web page and can even exceed the boundaries of the document — with some limitations — the major downside being that they don’t have shadows so this might uglify your styling a little.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm pretty sure that many people have thought of this, but for some reason
I have an ActiveX object which extends some functions. I have a web page
I have an MFC ActiveX control embedded in a web page. Some of the
I have a simple HTML5 page that I'm building to figure some things out
I have an activeX control on my classic ASP page. That page also includes
I have a .Net 2.0 activex control that is embedded within an HTML page
We have a web page that includes a custom OCX activex. The activex is
I have an ActiveX plugin that we need (if possible) to run in Firefox.
I have an ActiveX control that runs on a website, where the old version
I have an ActiveX control that I'm loading with JavaScript in Internet Explorer. It

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.