Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 108483
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T01:55:08+00:00 2026-05-11T01:55:08+00:00

I have an app where I want to link an instance of a model

  • 0

I have an app where I want to link an instance of a model to another instance of the same model via another model (i.e. Task1 > Relationship < Task2) and am wondering if I can use has_many :through for this.

Basically, the relationship model would have extra information (type_of_relationship, lag) so it would be ideal to have it as a joining model. However, there are not two models to join, only one … to itself. Would the has_many :through still work? If so, how would the join table look? With Rails conventions you would have two columns called Activity_id, which obviously won’t work in the database.

Alternatively, I can use has_many_and_belongs_to to set up a many-many between the Task model and the Relationship model but I’m not sure if this accurately describes a relationship that should only ever link two Task models in any one Relationship model (although of course the Tasks may belong to more than one Relationship, hence many-many).

My instinct says to go with has_many_and_belongs_to and sort out the rules in the models but is there a better way to do this? I’m going round in circles on this one!

Any help appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T01:55:08+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:55 am

    has_many :through fits perfectly into your situation. I don’t know about specifics of your model, but let’s say you have users and every user can have other users as contacts. You can model this situation as follows:

    class User < ActiveRecord::Base   has_many :contact_records, :foreign_key => :owner_id   has_many :contacts, :through => :contact_records, :class_name => 'User' end  class ContactRecord < ActiveRecord::Base   belongs_to :owner, :class_name => 'User'   belongs_to :user end 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 78k
  • Answers 78k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer Some compilers (like GCC for Linux) don't add _ by… May 11, 2026 at 3:42 pm
  • added an answer You should use: NSString * const kPolygonNumberOfSides = @'...'; //… May 11, 2026 at 3:42 pm
  • added an answer Use escape(oEditor.GetXHTML()). May 11, 2026 at 3:42 pm

Related Questions

This a bit of strange one.... We have an internal web app that runs
I've got a database with three tables: Books (with book details, PK is CopyID),
The situation is like this : Main project A. and a class library B.
Does anyone know, or have a link to an article or a step by

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.