Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 964227
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T01:47:36+00:00 2026-05-16T01:47:36+00:00

I have an application that fetches data from a database and stores it in

  • 0

I have an application that fetches data from a database and stores it in memory for later use.
I’ve tested this application for around 7000 data rows but when I want to use it for 10000 or more I ran into a StackOverflow exception. This is so weird because I think I should get OutOfMemory, not Stackoverflow if my data is too big.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T01:47:37+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 1:47 am

    You are right of course. Getting a stack overflow in C/C++ code is pretty easy to do:

    int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
    {
        char buffer[4 * 1024 * 1024];
        return 0;
    }
    

    The 4 to make sure it blows in 64-bit mode as well. But arrays are reference types in managed code. They get allocated on the heap, not the stack. In C# code, you would have to allocate a value type as a local variable to gobble up stack space. And the only value type type that qualifies to get you anywhere with that is a struct. That’s hard, you’d have to declare a struct that has a quarter of a million members, give or take. The only possible way to get one of those is a struct that was auto-generated from some kind of tool and a huge dbase scheme.

    That just doesn’t happen. Surely the problem is located in your dbase provider. Invariably written in C or C++. And doing something nasty like using _alloca() to blow the stack. The “stackalloc” keyword in C#. I’ll avoid mentioning the editbin.exe utility with the /stack argument to increase the size of the main thread stack, you shouldn’t have to monkey with that.

    Talk to your dbase provider provider.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.