Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6194235
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T03:15:43+00:00 2026-05-24T03:15:43+00:00

I have an application that has an array of pointers to MyObject objects: MyObject

  • 0

I have an application that has an array of pointers to MyObject objects:

MyObject **arr;
arr= new MyObject*[10];

The application has two threads, these threads will create and delete new MyObject() to array arr. Therefore arr[n] will be changed all the time, however the MyObject‘s themselves do not change.

Should I just declare:

volatile MyObject **arr;

Or should I go with:

MyObject ** volatile arr;

Thanks in advance

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T03:15:44+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 3:15 am

    I think you need MyObject * volatile * arr;.

    Please note though that volatile is not an atomic variable or a valid method of synchronization.

    Edit: Here it is: http://drdobbs.com/high-performance-computing/212701484

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an application that has many different types of objects that each persist
I have an application that has several objects (about 50 so far, but growing).
We have an application that has to be flexible in how it displays it's
I have an application that has created a number of custom event log sources
I have an application that has Powershell 1 embedded into it, but we need
We have an application that has one or more text console windows that all
I have an application that has multiple states, with each state responding to input
I have an application that has to deal with getting special characters in its
I have an application that has a primary layout of portrait (it is fixed
Background: We have an application that has been in the works for over a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.