Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7749565
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T11:04:39+00:00 2026-06-01T11:04:39+00:00

I have an application that is responsible for archiving old applications, which will do

  • 0

I have an application that is responsible for archiving old applications, which will do a large number of applications at a time and so it will need to run for days at a time.

When my company developed this they did a fair bit of performance testing on it and they seemed to get decent numbers out of this, but I have been running an archive for a customer recently and it seems to be running really slowly and the performance seems to be degrading even more longer it runs.

There does not appear to be a memory leak, as since I have monitoring it with jconsole there still is plenty of memory available and does not appear to be shrinking.

I have noticed however that the survivor space and tenured gen of the heap can very quickly fill up until a garbage collection comes along and clears it out which seems to be happening rather frequently which I am not sure if that could be a source of the apparent slow down.

The application has been running now for 7 days 3 hours and according to jconsole it has spent 6 hours performing copy garbage collection (772, 611 collections) and 12 hours and 25 minutes on marksweep compaction’s (145,940 collections).

This seems like a large amount of time to be spent on garbage collection and I am just wondering if anyone has looked into something like this before and knows if this is normal or not?

Edits

Local processing seems to be slow, for instance I am looking at one part in the logs that took 5 seconds to extract some xml from a SOAP envelope using xpath which it then appends to a string buffer along with a root tag.. that’s all it does. I haven’t profiled it yet, as this is running in production, I would either have to pull the data down over the net or set up a large test base in our dev environment which may end up having to do.

Running Java HotSpot Client VM version 10.0-b23

Really just need high throughput, haven’t configured any specific garbage collection parameters, would be running what ever the defaults would be. Not sure how to find what collectors would be in use?

Fix

End up getting a profiler going on it, turned out the cause of the slow down was some code that was constantly trimming lines off a status box outputting logging statements which was pretty badly done. Should have figured the garbage collection was symptom from constantly copying the status text into memory, rather than an actual cause.

Cheers Guys.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T11:04:40+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 11:04 am

    According to your numbers, total garbage collection time was about 18 hours out of 7 days execution time. At about 10% of total execution time, that’s slightly elevated, but even if you managed to get this down to 0%, you’d only have saved 10% execution time … so if you’re looking for substantial savings, you should better look into the other 90%, for instance with a profiler.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to build a windows server side application that will be responsible for
I have application that is up more than 3 days. I can see in
We have an application that is run in multi-monitor environments. Users normally have the
I have a Compact Framework 3.5 application that is responsible for scanning barcodes. There
Within an application it's possible to have different UIViewController s that need to share
Let's say I have an application A which is responsible for painting stuff on-screen
I have 3 application contexts: A global context which is responsible for launching Jetty
I have an application that creates a number of jobs and I want to
I have application that makes different queries with different results so the caching in
I have application that is connecting to the DB and if I enter incorrect

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.