Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 868963
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T10:13:49+00:00 2026-05-15T10:13:49+00:00

I have an application that needs to return search results from a SQL Server

  • 0

I have an application that needs to return search results from a SQL Server 2008 database. I would like to use a single stored procedure to return the results but I am finding that as I build the stored procedure it is full of many Else .. Else If statements with the query repeated over and over with slight variations depending on the users search criteria.

Is there a better way to go about this? I am trying to avoid writing dynamic SQL because I would like the benefits of an execution plan but I am thinking there must be a better way. Does anyone have any suggestions or perhaps examples of how best to design a stored procedure that has to deal with many search parameters, many of which may be NULL? Thank you.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T10:13:50+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 10:13 am

    I’ve always done this by using default values and conditions; e.g.

    CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[searchForElement]
    (
        @Town     nvarchar(100) = '',
        @County   nvarchar(100) = '',
        @postcode nvarchar(100) = ''
    )
    AS
    BEGIN
        SET NOCOUNT ON;
    
        SELECT <fields> 
    
        FROM table 
        WHERE 
            (@Town = ''             OR Town     LIKE '%'+@Town+'%')
            AND (@County = ''       OR County   LIKE '%'+@County+'%')
            AND (@postcode = ''     OR postcode LIKE '%'+@PostCode +'%')
    END
    

    Edit:

    As @gbn correctly advises the above will result in an index scan which may be a problem for large tables. If this is a problem the solution is to below using ISNULL and the fact that adding NULL to anything results in NULL it will allow an index seek because the ‘%’ is understood by the optimiser (tested on SQL2008). This may be less readable but it makes better use of the indexes.

    CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[searchForElement]
    (
        @Town     nvarchar(100) = NULL,
        @County   nvarchar(100) = NULL,
        @postcode nvarchar(100) = NULL
    )
    AS
    BEGIN
        SET NOCOUNT ON;
    
        SELECT <fields> 
    
        FROM table 
        WHERE   Town     LIKE ISNULL('%'+@Town+'%', '%')
           AND  County   LIKE ISNULL('%'+@County+'%', '%')
           AND  Postcode LIKE ISNULL('%'+@PostCode +'%', '%')
    END
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 435k
  • Answers 435k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer well actually figured it out myself. the getRow() stuff needs… May 15, 2026 at 3:32 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Here is the working copy of the program: #include <cstdio>… May 15, 2026 at 3:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Found a solution: SPDocumentLibrary fromList = (SPDocumentLibrary)SPContext.Current.Site.RootWeb.Lists.TryGetList(ListNames.DocmentListName); SPWeb currentWeb =… May 15, 2026 at 3:31 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.