Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8777633
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T19:19:18+00:00 2026-06-13T19:19:18+00:00

I have an application that takes a table of data from Excel, and imports

  • 0

I have an application that takes a table of data from Excel, and imports it into my embedded SpreadsheetGear.WorkbookView. I am aware of the limitations to the size of a worksheet in Excel, but I was wondering if Excel is able to handle sets of data that is larger than SpreadsheetGear. Has anyone ever run into this before?

Jake

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T19:19:19+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 7:19 pm

    I just did a test with SpreadsheetGear 2012 for .NET running in a .NET 4.5 x64 application and Excel 2013 x64 RTM both running on Windows 8 x64 with an overclocked Core i7-980X.

    I created a workbook with 10 million formulas (1,000,000 rows and 10 columns using the formula “=RAND()”).

    Excel 2013 created the workbook in 20.18 seconds, used 795MB of RAM and calculated in 0.39 seconds.

    SpreadsheetGear 2012 created the workbook in 0.42 seconds, used 153MB of RAM and calculated in 0.09 seconds.

    SpreadsheetGear is limited only by the amount of memory and is obviously more efficient than Excel 2013 when it comes to memory usage, not to mention the fact that SpreadsheetGear 2012 creates and calculates large workbooks faster than Excel 2013 – at least in this case.

    You can download the free evaluation of SpreadsheetGear for .NET here.

    Disclaimer: I own SpreadsheetGear LLC.

    Here is the code I ran for SpreadsheetGear:

        using System;
        using SpreadsheetGear;
    
        namespace SpreadsheetGearMemTest
        {
            class Program
            {
                static void Test(IWorkbook workbook, int rows, int cols)
                {
                    var worksheet = workbook.Worksheets[0];
                    var cells = worksheet.Cells;
                    var timer = System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch.StartNew();
                    var startMem = System.GC.GetTotalMemory(true);
                    cells[0, 0, rows - 1, cols - 1].Formula = "=RAND()";
                    timer.Stop();
                    var memUsed = System.GC.GetTotalMemory(true) - startMem;
                    var calcTimer = System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch.StartNew();
                    workbook.WorkbookSet.Calculate();
                    Console.WriteLine("Creating took {0} seconds and {1}MB, calc took {2} seconds.",
                        timer.Elapsed.TotalSeconds, memUsed / (1024.0 * 1024.0), calcTimer.Elapsed.TotalSeconds);
                    workbook.Close();
                }
    
                static void Main(string[] args)
                {
                    // Get the code JITed.
                    Test(Factory.GetWorkbook(), 100, 10);
                    // Do the test.
                    Test(Factory.GetWorkbook(), 1000000, 10);
                }
            }
        }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a custom routing application that takes information for a route from google
We have a web application that produces reports. Data are taken from a database.
I have a web application that has a requirement to take data from an
I have a silverlight 3 application, that fetches some simple data from a ms-sql-server
I have a maintenance application that has to turn enterprise data (from various databases/tables)
I have an application which takes data from a file and stores it for
I have an application that is scheduled and get some data from a another
I have an application that takes some input and generates configuration files as output.
I have an application that takes a couple of seconds to run. Is it
I have a single-view application that takes in a username and a password and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.