Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7549577
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T09:58:46+00:00 2026-05-30T09:58:46+00:00

I have an application where I have many Searches running at the same time

  • 0

I have an application where I have many “Searches” running at the same time (the searches take 1 – 10 sec to complete, depending on how many results the are available) The problem is that the delay when searching keeps getting bigger ( I Think because 25 Max threads) Im using Backgroundworker Class Atm. So I looked up a few other implementations:

Simple Examples :

    static void Main()
{

    for (int i = 0; i < 500; i++)
    {
        try
        {
            new Thread(new ParameterizedThreadStart(doWork)).Start(i);
        }
        catch { }
    }
    Console.ReadLine();
}
static void doWork(object i)
{
    Console.WriteLine(i + ": started");
    Thread.Sleep(1000);
    Console.WriteLine(i + " done");
    Thread.CurrentThread.Abort();
}

But I get exceptions that I abort the threads (wich worries me)
So I tried whith the threadpool :

static void Main()
{

    for (int i = 0; i < 500; i++)
    {
        ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(new WaitCallback(doWork), i);
    }
    Console.ReadLine();
}
static void doWork(object i)
{
    Console.WriteLine(i + ": started");
    Thread.Sleep(1000);
    Console.WriteLine(i + " done");
}

But this goes verry slow…

I’m still looking for the best implementation, Can anyone help me ?

EDIT: The DoWork Method Makes a Network Connection (and wait for it to complete) This is With An API so I can’t do async

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T09:58:47+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 9:58 am

    Thread pool tries to minimize number of threads created and instead of creating new threads for queued tasks it can wait for other threads in the pool to be freed. It does that for a reason – too many threads can hamper performance. But you can override minimum number of threads to be created before this throttling happens.

    Here is your original code with correction to make it work fast:

    static void Main()
    {
        int minWorker, minIOC;
        ThreadPool.GetMinThreads(out minWorker, out minIOC);
        ThreadPool.SetMinThreads(50, minIOC);
        for (int i = 0; i < 500; i++)
        {
            ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(new WaitCallback(doWork), i);
        }
        Console.ReadLine();
    }
    
    static void doWork(object i)
    {
        Console.WriteLine(i + ": started");
        Thread.Sleep(1000);
        Console.WriteLine(i + " done");
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an application that has many different types of objects that each persist
I have an application that writes many times to a formula/macro-laden workbook. It loops
I have an application that contains many controls on a panel, each with its
Many many programs have communities that adds languages to the application after it got
I want to use bar chart in web application. I have searched many libraries
I have an application with many different parts, it runs on OSGi, so there's
I have an application with many views. I want only a couple of the
I'm using JSF 1.2 with Richfaces and Facelets. I have an application with many
I have always wondered about this. So many application setups have a zip file
A small - little question. I have seen many application having buttons like following.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.