Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8081305
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T16:41:24+00:00 2026-06-05T16:41:24+00:00

I have an application which uses code that produces various types of objects and

  • 0

I have an application which uses code that produces various types of objects and data structures, returning them as Object instances, and would like a generic way of establishing whether any of those objects is “empty” (or null).

(This is not a matter of design, or of whether such a method should be used, but a question of optimizing the solution to an existing requirement.)

So, here is a simple go:

public static boolean isEmpty(Object content)
{
    if (content == null)
    {
        return true;
    }
    else if (content instanceof CharSequence)
    {
        return (((CharSequence)content).length() == 0);
    }
    else if (content instanceof Collection<?>)
    {
        return ((Collection<?>)content).isEmpty();
    }
    else if (content instanceof Object[])
    {
        return (((Object[])content).length == 0);
    }
    else  // Use reflection (an exaggeration, for demo purposes)
    {
        try
        {
            Method isEmpty = content.getClass().
                             getDeclaredMethod("isEmpty", (Class<?>[])null);
            if (isEmpty != null)
            {
                Object result = isEmpty.invoke(content, (Object[])null);

                if (result instanceof Boolean)
                {
                    return (Boolean)result;
                }
            }
        }
        catch (Exception e)
        {
        }
    }

    return false;
}

Any ideas for potential improvements, in terms of either performance, or coverage?

For instance, reflection could be also used to establish whether the object has a length() or size() method, invoke it and see if the result is 0. (In reality, reflection is probably too much, but I am including it here for completeness.)

Is there a top-level class very commonly used, which has a length() or size() method, instead of the isEmpty() method, to include in the above case, similarly to Collection that has isEmpty()?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T16:41:25+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 4:41 pm

    Instead of the ugly instanceofs, split up the method into several methods with the same name but different args. e.g.

    static boolean isEmpty(Object[] array)
    static boolean isEmpty(Collection collection)
    static boolean isEmpty(CharSequence cs)
    

    Instead of reflection, if you really want your own interface for special objects, declare that interface, and then, for consistency with the above, offer the static utility

    static boolean isEmpty(IMayBeEmpty imbe);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an application which uses the microsoft kinect device. The thing is that
I have a Lisp (SBCL 1.0.40.0.debian) application (myfitnessdata), which uses the following code to
I have downloaded SSHCore source code which uses libssh2 library. That code build successfully,
I have a WPF application which uses some library code for authentication which needs
I have an application which uses some external library for analytics. Problem is that
I have a paid android application which uses the google LVL code to authenticate
I have application which uses Sherlock ActionBar package. The application uses platform-specific behavior for
I have an application which uses JSPs and Servlets and deployed on IBM-WASCE 2.1.
I have a web application which uses the globalization values being passed from sql
I have a little application which uses regular expressions under VB6. It works perfectly

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.