Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1050349
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T16:45:27+00:00 2026-05-16T16:45:27+00:00

I have an Article model that has a foreign key relationship with Author that

  • 0

I have an Article model that has a foreign key relationship with Author that needs to use a limit_choices_to because I have over 2,000 possible authors in the database. The problem is that when these authors no longer meet the limit_choices_to criteria (e.g. they become inactive), they disappear from the author field when I edit old articles and therefore I can’t save them as the author on those old articles.

How do I use limit_choices_to while preserving the value in the field, even if it would otherwise be excluded by limit_choices_to?

I have tried customizing save() and init, rewriting the original value using clean(), and even tried to use a custom admin form without success. Surely someone has run into this dilemma and I’m probably missing something easy, but I’m stumped.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T16:45:28+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 4:45 pm

    I think the way to do this would be in the init of a custom form, where you could dynamically modify the choices of the Author field to include the current author. Something like (untested):

    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super(MyForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
        current_author_id = self.instance.author_id
        self.fields['author'].queryset = Author.objects.filter(Q(is_active=True) | 
                                                             Q(pk=current_author_id))
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two models, Article and Post that both inherit from a base model
I have a model that has an attribute that is an Array. What's the
I have a pretty generic Article model, with m2m relation to Tag model. I
Ok, I have a model that is very simple: ServiceType(id: integer, title: string, duration:
This MSDN article states that: An isolation level has connection-wide scope, and once set
I have lots of article store in MS SQL server 2005 database in a
Per this helpful article I have confirmed I have a connection pool leak in
I have checked with the wikipedia article , and it seems like it is
I have been reading the proper article in MSDN, Strong-Named Assemblies and a related
I have quickly read (and will read with more care soon) the article of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.