Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 236263
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T20:19:52+00:00 2026-05-11T20:19:52+00:00

I have an author class: class Author < ActiveRecord::Base def to_s name end end

  • 0

I have an author class:

class Author < ActiveRecord::Base
  def to_s
    name
  end
end

Defining to_s allows me to do puts Author.first, but not puts Author.first.rjust(10):

NoMethodError: undefined method `rjust' for #<Author:0x21eb5d4>

Wouldn’t it be better if Ruby automatically tried to_s before the string method in cases like this? Is there any way to get this behavior?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T20:19:52+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 8:19 pm

    First off, no, it wouldn’t. I don’t want ruby to just say “Hey, maybe this is a string method, let me see if I can run it after running to_s” on an arbitrary object. That being said, there are two solutions to what you want to do:

    If you want to say “On any Author instance, if someone calls a method that it doesn’t have, but that String does, then it should magically call to_s“, then do this:

    class Author < ActiveRecord::Base
      def to_s
        name
      end
    
      def method_missing(s, *a)
        x = to_s
        if x.respond_to? s then
          return x.send(s, *a)
        else
          super
        end
      end
    end
    

    If you want to say “rjust on anything that isn’t a String should mean calling to_s first”, then:

    class Object
      def rjust(*a)
        to_s.rjust(*a)
      end
    end
    

    (Repeat with other methods as desired; note that this allows you to do things like 86.rjust(10); whether that’s a good thing or not may be a matter of taste)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 122k
  • Answers 122k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This has nothing to do with MVC. I am using… May 12, 2026 at 12:50 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It seems like there is no way to do this… May 12, 2026 at 12:50 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Nothing will 'synchronize' or 'block' unless you write code in… May 12, 2026 at 12:50 am

Related Questions

Expanding on recent_posts_on_self below, I want to add an all_recent_posts_on_self method but I'm not
In an application similar to StackOverflow that I am building, I am trying to
I'm currently learning Django and some of my models have custom methods to get
Embedded custom-tag in dynamic content (nested tag) not rendering. I have a page that

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.