Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 937495
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T21:29:21+00:00 2026-05-15T21:29:21+00:00

I have an entity User and it should have property manager where manager is

  • 0

I have an entity User and it should have property manager where manager is another user (one manager can manage many users, any user may have only 1 manager or have not any).

How can I implement this?

I tried something standard

@ManyToOne
@JoinColumn (name = ??? /* what should be here? */, nullable = true)
private User manager;

but it’s not as simple as it seems..

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T21:29:22+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 9:29 pm

    What’s the problem? Use the default value i.e. don’t set the name if you don’t know how to name the join column (should default to something like MANAGER_ID). From the javadoc of the name attribute:

    (Optional) The name of the foreign key
    column
    . The table in which it is found
    depends upon the context. If the join
    is for a OneToOne or Many- ToOne
    mapping, the foreign key column is in
    the table of the source entity
    . If the
    join is for a ManyToMany, the foreign
    key is in a join table. Default (only
    applies if a single join column is
    used): The concatenation of the
    following: the name of the referencing
    relationship property or field of the
    referencing entity; “_”; the name of
    the referenced primary key column. If
    there is no such referencing
    relationship property or field in the
    entity, the join column name is formed
    as the concatenation of the following:
    the name of the entity; “_”; the name
    of the referenced primary key column.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.