Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8510833
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T03:48:48+00:00 2026-06-11T03:48:48+00:00

I have an idea that sounds like it might work but I’m not entirely

  • 0

I have an idea that sounds like it might work but I’m not entirely sure, so looking for advice as to whether this can be achieved and how.

On my web form, i have a bool value named ‘error’.

There are a number of things that need to happen on a page for it to be successfully loaded.

I could write code like this:

bool thisSuccess = DoThis();
if(!thisSuccess)
    then error;

bool thatSuccess = DoThat();
if(!thatSuccess)
    then error;

if(error)
  FailoverActions();

and so on.

Of course that would be wholley inefficient so I thought it may be posible to create a delegate of some kind where the code would look something like this:

error = DoThis();

… and some kind of trigger here that called a function when error = true;

Apologies for the lack of precise detail but this is new ground for me.


Update

Thanks to everyone for their great ideas.

The reason that there’s little detail is that i’m very inexperienced and what I’ve found to date with .net is that although there are many ways to crack an egg, there’s generally some better than others.

I appreciate your experienced views.

Thanks again.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T03:48:50+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 3:48 am

    First – having your methods return true or false is a questionable practice – it looks like you should be using exceptions to handle this, especially if errors are relatively rare.

    Sample code:

    try
    {
        DoThis();
        DoThat();
    }
    catch(DoingThingsException ex)
    {
        FailoverActions();
        //throw; //?
    }
    

    As for a quick solution, one option is short-circuiting:

    bool success = DoThis() && DoThat() && DoTheOther();
    if(!success) FailoverActions();
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some idea that it is due to some complex calculation, but i
We have developed a set of crystal reports (not my idea) that are to
I have an idea for an app that I would like to build which
I don't think this is possible, but thought someone might have a nifty idea
For the last year or so I have followed the idea that if a
I have always gone by the idea that casting should be avoided at all
Im working on a small application to try out an idea that I have.
The idea is that say you have the following table. ------------- | oID |
the basic idea is that you have some class that has a reference type
The main idea is that I have several worker instances of a Rails app,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.