Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3604252
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T20:58:28+00:00 2026-05-18T20:58:28+00:00

I have an indexed field users.username, which is only used in the admin interface.

  • 0

I have an indexed field users.username, which is only used in the admin interface. Because the table has currently lots of writes, I’d like to remove that index. Of course I want to keep the index searchable for admins.

I could extract the whole column, to move that index to another table. But it feels stupid because I’m already planning to move the write heavy fields into another table (with just one index).

Throwing in an search engine would be overkill.

Any ideas for a simple solution?

[edit]
I’ve just realized that the need for the admins to search and sort lots of fields has impact on many tables (which would actually need much more indexes). For the first step I’ll ensure that the admins get an dedicated server+db to keep off the slow sorts/searches from live servers and in the long run I’ll investigate if a search engine is suitable. Thanks all!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T20:58:28+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 8:58 pm

    Maintaining an index only accessible by certain users is not supported in MySQL, and even if it was, it would be as expensive as maintaining a usual index.

    Assuming the usernames are unique, you can create a separate index-like table like that:

    CREATE TABLE shadow_username (username VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, userid INT NOT NULL, UNIQUE (userid))
    

    , fill in on a timely basis:

    TRUNCATE
            shadow_username
    
    INSERT
    INTO    shadow_username
    SELECT  username, id
    FROM    users
    

    and query it:

    SELECT  u.*
    FROM    (
            SELECT  id
            FROM    shadow_username
            WHERE   username = 'user'
            ) s
    JOIN    users u
    ON      u.id = s.id
    UNION ALL
    SELECT  u.*
    FROM    users
    WHERE   id >
            (
            SELECT  MAX(id)
            FROM    shadow_username
            )
            AND username = 'user'
    UNION ALL
    SELECT  *
    FROM    users
    WHERE   username = 'user'
    LIMIT 1
    

    The first part does a normal search; the second part processes the usernames that were inserted in between the updates to shadow_username; the third part is a fallback method which does a normal search only if previous two steps found nothing (that may happen if a user changed their username).

    If the username never changes, you should omit the third step.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a description field indexed in Lucene.This field contains a book's description. How
My indexed documents have a field containing a pipe-delimited set of ids: a845497737704e8ab439dd410e7f1328| 0a2d7192f75148cca89b6df58fcf2e54|
I have two models indexed for searching (User and Item). I'm trying to do
Have just started using Visual Studio Professional's built-in unit testing features, which as I
Have you used VS.NET Architect Edition's Application and System diagrams to start designing a
I have a web page where users upload&watch videos. Last week I asked what
I have a model called Profile which is belong_to User, so there is 'user_id'
I have 5 tables Questions_Answers AID | QID | otherStuff | Username | UserID
I have a SUPER slow query, which I posted here: http://pastebin.com/E5sdRi7e . When I
A quick question. I have a simple table with this structure: USERS_TABLE = {id},

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.