Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 407437
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T17:35:40+00:00 2026-05-12T17:35:40+00:00

I have an interface called IAddress, and a class called Address that handles street,

  • 0

I have an interface called IAddress, and a class called Address that handles street, city, state/province, postal code and country. I have a couple of Linq2Sql classes that has all the address information and would like to implement the interface IAddress, and pass that in to the constructor for Address that would the load the property values.

Is it possible have a Linq2Sql class impment and interface through the partial class that I created for it? Thanks in advance!

Additional comments

In my class I have a property called MailToStreet, I want that to map to IAddress.Street. Is there a way to do this in the partial class?

Solved

Thanks StackOverflow community! It was a snap! Here is my final code:

public partial class Location : IAddress
{
    string IAddress.Street
    {
        get { return this.Street; }
        set { this.Street = value; }
    }

    string IAddress.City
    {
        get { return this.City; }
        set { this.City = value; }
    }

    string IAddress.StateProvince
    {
        get { return this.StateProvince; }
        set { this.StateProvince = value; }
    }

    string IAddress.PostalCode
    {
        get { return this.PostalCode; }
        set { this.PostalCode = value; }
    }

    string IAddress.Country
    {
        get { return this.Country; }
        set { this.Country = value; }
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T17:35:40+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:35 pm

    LinqToSQL classes are partial classes, so you can have an additional file that implements the interface for the LinqToSQL class.

    Just add this to a new file, using the same class name as your LinqToSQL class:

    public partial class LinqToSqlClass : IFoo {
        public void Foo() {
            // implementation
        }
    }
    

    If your LinqToSQL class already implements the necessary proporties you should be able to only include the interface declaration.

    To answer the comment about using a differently-named LinqToSQL property to implement the interface, you can use the syntax above and just call the LinqToSQL property from the interface property, or to keep things a bit cleaner, use explicit implementation:

    public partial class LinqToSqlClass : IFoo {
        void IFoo.Foo() {
            return this.LinqFoo(); // assumes LinqFoo is in the linq to sql mapping
        }
    }
    

    By using this syntax, clients accessing your class will not see a redundant property used only for implementing an interface (it will be invisible unless the object is cast to that interface)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an Interface called IStep that can do some computation (See Execution in
I have a property called IsSecureConnection that is part of my object's interface. This
I have a class Interface, that has pure virtual methods. In another class I
I have an interface called Dictionary which has a method insert() . This interface
I have an interface called ICommand from which various classes inherit. These classes all
I'm having a small problem in Java. I have an interface called Modifiable. Objects
If I have interface IFoo, and have several classes that implement it, what is
Suppose we have: interface Foo { bool Func(int x); } class Bar: Foo {
Lets say you have interface definition. That interface can be Operation . Then you
Have a interface class abc { public: virtual int foo() = 0; ... }

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.