Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 872337
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T10:46:14+00:00 2026-05-15T10:46:14+00:00

I have an interface like below public interface FooDAO { public void callA(String x);

  • 0

I have an interface like below

public interface FooDAO {
  public void callA(String x);
}

and an implementation as below deliberately making readonly true and not supported

public class FooDAOImpl implements FooDAO {

  //for testing
  @Transactional(readOnly = true, propagation = Propagation.NOT_SUPPORTED) 
  public void callA(String x) {
     //sql update method
  }
}

In my spring context, I declared the Datasource transaction manager and the tx:annotation-driven. I wrote a Junit4 test that looks like

@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration(...)
@TransactionConfiguration(transactionManager="txManager", defaultRollback=true)
public class MyTest {

    @Resource
    FooDAO fooDAO;

    @Test
    public void testRegisterWorker() {
        fooDAO.callA("")
    }
}

I would have expected the record to not be inserted into the database at all. However I see that the row has infact been inserted into the DB. I do use the Oracle database so I think the autocommit is set to true by default (I think). But shouldn’t the spring transactional tags override them?

Can someone tell me what is going wrong here?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T10:46:14+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 10:46 am

    Autocommit probably is on by default. With DataSourceTransactionManager, autocommit is only changed if a transaction is actually started. Neither NOT_SUPPORTED or SUPPORTS start a transaction, so whatever default state the Connection is in will remain.

    Consider setting autocommit off by default in your Spring xml file. If it is enabled, Spring will have to change it before each tx and restore it afterwards, which may be expensive in Oracle (not sure). This also prevents you from accidentally committing outside of a transaction.

    For the details, see org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager.doBegin() which manages the autocomit and isolation level of the Connection. doBegin() is only called by AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.getTransaction() and handleExistingTransaction() if the propagation is REQUIRED, REQUIRES_NEW or PROPAGATION_NESTED.


    You probably want to take a look at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.AbstractTransactionalJUnit4SpringContextTests. This is a Spring aware base class you can use for your test classes. It will rollback any transactions at the end of each test case. This way there is no need to change the annotations just for test. You can set your @Transactional the way they should be in prod and rely on the rollbacks to make sure nothing is actually changed in the db during the test.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.