Home/ Questions/Q 6548775
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-25T12:00:39+00:00

I have an iPhone app that is using web services implemented in Python, using

  • 0

I have an iPhone app that is using web services implemented in Python, using Django and Piston, running on an apache server through WSGI.

Sometimes the app closes its connection to the server before a call is finished. When it does this it causes a:

[Tue Sep 06 11:29:46 2011] [error] [client 207.35.164.99] mod_wsgi (pid=820): Exception occurred processing WSGI script 'myscript.wsgi'.
[Tue Sep 06 11:29:46 2011] [error] [client 207.35.164.99] IOError: failed to write data

to appear in my server’s error logs.

I can “fix” the problem in the app by not explicitly closing the connection, but just leaving it to finish downloading and ignoring the result. However, I’d like fix this on the server-side if possible. How can I do it?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    [disclaimer: this is a “why it can’t be easily done” explanation, not a solution]

    As @Slott pointed out, this is definitely the technically correct behavior when stream.close or stream.write is called on a closed socket. However, I understand the motivation for the question… in the context of a wsgi app, clients terminating the connection after a full or partial read is not an “exceptional” behavior, it happens all the time. For it to be left unhandled leaves the impression it was unexpected / the code was unprepared for this, when in fact it’s expected, and shouldn’t be worthy of note. So it’d be nice to fix.

    The catch is that you’d have to find a way to distinguish cases…

    • Situations like “client read ‘Status: 304’, and then closed connection” or “client read all bytes, and then closed connection, even though it had requested connection should be reused” are ones where it would be appropriate to not issue any sort of logging besides a log.debug() call.

    • But situations like “client stopped reading in the middle of file because connection died when an ISP router had a stroke” are worthy of an error being logged. Something didn’t successfully complete, and any transactional state your server app builtup should be rolled back. In which case IOError propagating upwards is the right thing to do.

    Such errors are only silenceable if at every place they could be raised, the code is modified to distinguish those two cases. Until then, the wsgi authors seem to have erred on the side of caution. So there isn’t a quick fix for this that I know of.

    (Also, I should note this isn’t django-specific, I use paste+pylons and have the same thing happen)

    • 0