Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 614033
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T18:04:05+00:00 2026-05-13T18:04:05+00:00

I have an ipv4 server that only accepts connections over localhost (using INADDR_LOOPBACK ).

  • 0

I have an ipv4 server that only accepts connections over localhost (using INADDR_LOOPBACK). I’d like to convert this server to be dual-stack ipv6/ipv4. However, using in6addr_loopback only accepts connections to ::1.

I’ve found that I can accept ipv4 and ipv6 connections simultaneously using in6addr_any, but as this also allows connections from anywhere it’s not useful for my particular case.

Is it possible to bind to ipv6 localhost (::1) and ipv4 localhost (127.0.0.1) simultaneously?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T18:04:06+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:04 pm

    AFAIK, that is not possible.

    What you will need to do is create two sockets, one bound to INADDR_LOOPBACK and one bound to in6addr_loopback. You can then wait on both of them simultaneously using your multiplexer of choice (poll, select, epoll, etc0).

    Update

    Just came up with some work-arounds that you may want to consider. In both of these work-arounds, you bind to in6addr_any.

    1. When a connection is established, check the remote address and if it’s not 127.0.0.1 or ::1, close it. While the behavior of connecting on an IP address is not ideal (connections are established/immediately closed instead of being refused), the nice thing it that this can be done purely in your application.
    2. Adjust the settings of your OS’s IP stack to refuse connections to your port from non loopback IP’s. This is definitely doable on Linux with iptables. While the behavior is more ideal, it requires configuration external to your application.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 365k
  • Answers 365k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can use the data in the /proc filesystem to… May 14, 2026 at 3:57 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Do you still get the error when you use a… May 14, 2026 at 3:57 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can use array_chunk to create a single array comprised… May 14, 2026 at 3:57 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.