Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7574549
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T16:27:45+00:00 2026-05-30T16:27:45+00:00

I have an irregular time series and am using xts ‘s endpoints to get

  • 0

I have an irregular time series and am using xts‘s endpoints to get hourly indices of my time series.

endpoints(data, on="hours")

I am using this in order to calculate hourly in such fashion

period.apply(data, INDEX=endpoints(data, on="hours"), FUN=mean)

The problem, however, is that function endpoints returns two consecutive indices (thus for the same hour).

> endpoints(data, on="hours")[7201:7220]
[1] 87077 87078 87089 87101 87113 87125 87137 87149 87162 87175 87187 87199 87211 87223 87235 87247 87259 87271 87283 87295

If we take a look which datetimes they represent:

data[endpoints(data, on="hours")[7201:7220]]

we notice that these are

> data[endpoints(data, on="hours")[7201:7220]]
                 jstimestamp X61757 X61754 X61760 X61753 X61758 X61762 X61756 X61759 X61761 X61755 X61752
2007-10-28 01:55:00 1.193529e+12  938.7 1339.6  450.8  799.4  850.0 1653.6  622.3  159.6 4415.4  681.6 1421.0
2007-10-28 02:00:00 1.193530e+12  946.0 1326.3  437.8  799.9  829.3 1644.1  629.0  182.8 4413.7  688.5 1397.2
2007-10-28 02:55:00 1.193533e+12  916.4 1337.0  432.3  778.0  838.6 1581.5  616.8  166.0 4282.8  670.9 1361.8
2007-10-28 03:55:00 1.193540e+12  909.1 1273.8  446.9  765.4  836.2 1559.7  599.5  163.8 4191.2  667.9 1373.3
2007-10-28 04:55:00 1.193544e+12  930.8 1320.3  426.4  758.3  834.8 1567.5  594.0  152.7 4130.2  688.4 1377.3
2007-10-28 05:55:00 1.193547e+12  943.5 1355.1  447.7  784.6  856.9 1592.4  629.0  163.8 4150.3  686.2 1391.5
2007-10-28 06:55:00 1.193551e+12 1018.3 1443.2  463.7  841.0  877.1 1677.3  670.8  161.8 4310.8  708.9 1441.3
2007-10-28 07:55:00 1.193554e+12 1052.2 1525.7  472.5  887.7  903.6 1734.9  716.1  199.5 4390.9  722.7 1504.3
2007-10-28 08:52:34 1.193558e+12 1167.1 1570.3  519.2  933.0  957.5 1919.9  795.0  225.5 4706.4  733.0 1561.1
2007-10-28 09:55:00 1.193562e+12 1224.1 1653.4  547.2  992.1 1039.9 2053.5  797.2  217.9 4952.1  739.4 1610.6
2007-10-28 10:55:00 1.193565e+12 1233.4 1745.9  569.8 1038.1 1060.8 2145.3  778.0  231.6 5182.4  759.1 1621.5
2007-10-28 11:55:00 1.193569e+12 1217.8 1751.6  581.3 1056.6 1084.2 2177.6  791.0  246.6 5296.4  758.6 1642.0
2007-10-28 12:55:00 1.193572e+12 1212.5 1786.3  589.2 1034.4 1069.2 2191.2  784.4  242.2 5357.5  728.5 1670.8
2007-10-28 13:55:00 1.193576e+12 1200.1 1694.8  586.1 1059.3 1063.2 2174.2  773.3  248.6 5336.7  747.8 1650.6
2007-10-28 14:55:00 1.193580e+12 1188.1 1736.7  577.7 1049.9 1041.1 2168.4  771.5  233.6 5332.9  746.9 1651.5
2007-10-28 15:55:00 1.193583e+12 1187.9 1696.8  574.1 1056.9 1060.4 2152.6  790.4  255.8 5326.9  740.6 1653.0
2007-10-28 16:55:00 1.193587e+12 1250.3 1793.2  580.8 1048.1 1116.8 2232.6  810.2  257.1 5360.4  765.6 1688.4
2007-10-28 17:55:00 1.193590e+12 1325.9 1796.0  614.7 1148.7 1134.2 2368.6  816.9  301.6 5530.3  772.7 1673.1
2007-10-28 18:55:00 1.193594e+12 1433.2 1966.3  697.8 1183.6 1276.2 2615.3  928.2  324.1 5805.4  762.7 1853.9
2007-10-28 19:55:00 1.193598e+12 1436.2 1906.2  678.5 1196.9 1217.9 2575.4  882.2  337.1 5809.5  789.7 1852.5

The problem is that hour 2007-10-28 02 is represented twice. My understanding of hourly endpoints is that this should not happen. Am I doing something wrong here?

Edit: This was indeed daylight savings in effect as per Dirk Eddelbuettel’s answer below. To resolve the problem, I needed to:

  1. convert to timezone UTC when parsing the data (the default timezone that was applied was my machine’s -> CET)
  2. after calculating hourly means as:

    data.hourly = period.apply(data, INDEX=endpoints(data, on=”hours”), FUN=mean)

I needed to manually override data.hourly’s time zone as well (again, default computer’s time zone was used):

indexTZ(data.hourly) <- "UTC"
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T16:27:46+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 4:27 pm

    Just a hunch but this may be yet another manifestation of TZ and a switch from standard time to daylight savings time. Try to convert to UTC and see what happens.

    Alternatively, move your data by a week (or month or …) and see if the same issue arises.

    And if that’s the issue. then this is not really a bug as the ‘fall back’ night has indeed two hours starting at 02:00am.

    Edit: And while you didn’t say what your timezone was, and while it doesn’t work in mine (US Central), we can exhibit the issue for the European continent:

    R> ISOdate(2007, 10, 28, 0, 30, 0, tz="Europe/Berlin") + seq(0,4)*60*60
    [1] "2007-10-28 00:30:00 CEST" "2007-10-28 01:30:00 CEST"
    [3] "2007-10-28 02:30:00 CEST" "2007-10-28 02:30:00 CET" 
    [5] "2007-10-28 03:30:00 CET" 
    R> 
    

    See how

    1. the TZ attribute switches from CEST to CET

    2. there are in fact two 02:30:00 hours, one for each of the two timezones.

    So no bug in xts but a feature in the data.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an irregular time series ( xts in R ) that I want
If I have some multivariate irregular time series, such as zoo or xts objects
I need to add two irregular time series (covering business days). I have two
I have a whole bunch of data.frames with irregular time spacing. I would like
I have an irregular list where the data look like this: [Number] [Number] [Number]
I have an irregular time series that I'm working with that I'd like to
Have you managed to get Aptana Studio debugging to work? I tried following this,
I have data at a number of days since an event. This data is
I have a time series of temperature profiles that I want to interpolate, I
So I have this irregular shaped polygon. I draw it by filling the inside

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.