Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8441601
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T08:36:13+00:00 2026-06-10T08:36:13+00:00

I have an iterative function, phi, that calls itself many times to return the

  • 0

I have an iterative function, phi, that calls itself many times to return the correct result.

def phi(n, primes, phis):

where primes is a list of primes, 1 < n < 10,000,000
and phis is a list of totient values over the same range of n.

Is it expensive computation-wise to do this in Python? My guess is it does not cost much as we are dealing with pointers in Python so all that will get passed is the pointer? However with this function even the POINTERS would get passed a lot (read: sh##load). Is that computationally expensive?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T08:36:15+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 8:36 am

    You are right, you are not passing the whole list but a pointer. You’ll be incurring the regular overhead for function calls which will be much more than the passing of a pointer/parameter.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have written a simple script that calls a function in a while loop.
I have a single xml parsing function that I'm trying to call multiple times
I have a large script that is very synchronous. 1) it runs a function
I have a member function of an object that is typically used in an
After completing an assignment to create Pascal's triangle using an iterative function, I have
I'm writing an interactive function that I'd like to have remember the last argument
I have a function in java which is written with a recursive algorithm that
I have created a function that reads lists of ID pairs (i.e. [(A,B),(B,C),(C,D),...] and
I have a function witch is written in an imperative style and cant get
After some recursive function I have an array: first iteration: Array ( [category_id] =>

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.