Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 42007
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T15:16:14+00:00 2026-05-10T15:16:14+00:00

I have an object in a multi-threaded environment that maintains a collection of information,

  • 0

I have an object in a multi-threaded environment that maintains a collection of information, e.g.:

public IList<string> Data  {     get      {         return data;     } } 

I currently have return data; wrapped by a ReaderWriterLockSlim to protect the collection from sharing violations. However, to be doubly sure, I’d like to return the collection as read-only, so that the calling code is unable to make changes to the collection, only view what’s already there. Is this at all possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 3 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T15:16:14+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 3:16 pm

    If your underlying data is stored as list you can use List(T).AsReadOnly method.
    If your data can be enumerated, you can use Enumerable.ToList method to cast your collection to List and call AsReadOnly on it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a multi-threaded app that uses Core Data. I've been seeing a lot
I have an object that has a multi-part key and I am struggling to
i have a multi-threaded application which wants to send a sequence of data to
I am creating some multi-threaded code, and I have created a JobDispatcher class that
I have a multi threaded app that writes log to file. occasionaly, saving fails
I am trying to implement core data entities in a multi-threaded environment. I understand
I have a simple multi-threaded program, with the following structure. public void someFunction() {
it may be basic question to have a singleton in multi-threaded environment we can
we have designed a multi threaded server that use linq to sql at each
I have two tables: object that has object_id column and avalues that have object_id

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.