Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9154727
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T12:28:28+00:00 2026-06-17T12:28:28+00:00

I have an object in which the constructor’s job is to set the fields

  • 0

I have an object in which the constructor’s job is to set the fields and they aren’t set up or changed after that, ever. However, I need a getter for them. Then, do I need to have setters even though I won’t ever use them “just in case” or I can remove them and leave the getters only while leaving setting the values to the constructor?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T12:28:28+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 12:28 pm

    According to the java bean specification, it is legal to omit a getter or setter
    method. so, you can safely omit the setter if you never use them

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a Python object which has certain attributes that are set after the
I have observed that after an exception I have an object for which constructor
I have an object which has several properties that are set when the object
I have an object called Result<T> that has a constructor which accepts an argument
I have an object which has both a copy constructor and assignment operator defined.
You have an immutable object, and you set its internal variables in the constructor
I have an object of class which has private constructor: class CL_GUIComponent { //
I have an object TestProperty which implements ITestProperty. TestProperty takes a string constructor argument.
After much research I am still stumped. I have a serial port object which
In my program; I have an object which stores name, description, languages that he/she

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.