Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3877046
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T22:27:08+00:00 2026-05-19T22:27:08+00:00

i have an object that is a: IQueryable<Foo> and i want to pass it

  • 0

i have an object that is a:

IQueryable<Foo>

and i want to pass it into a function that expects a:

IQueryable<IFoo>

Foo DOES implements IFoo

why wouldn’t this compile? what is the best way to convert to have this work?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T22:27:08+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 10:27 pm

    Co- and contra- variance were added in the .NET 4 BCL, and do not exist in the .NET 3.5 BCL.

    You can work around this limitation in 3.5 by using the Select operation to cast to your interface type:

    IQueryable<Foo> foos = ..;
    myFunc(foos.Select(x => (IFoo)x));
    

    Edit (from Reed’s comment, below):

    IQueryable<Foo> foos = ..;
    myFunc(foos.Cast<IFoo>());
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an object that implements an interface. I want to call on the
I have a Linq query that returns an object of the type IQueryable<ClassX> .
I have an IQueryable object like this var persons = from m in db.Persons
I understand that if you have some function in a linq query that does
I have a view that I pass a viewmodel object to that contains an
I have two tables: object that has object_id column and avalues that have object_id
I have an object that hasn't been created yet (so it has no ID),
I have an object that requires the URL of a file that resides in
I have an object that I instantiate - it's quite nifty as it also
I have an object that is basically a Python implementation of an Oracle sequence.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.