Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6825005
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T21:58:10+00:00 2026-05-26T21:58:10+00:00

I have an object with a method that I’d like to pass to a

  • 0

I have an object with a method that I’d like to pass to a function as a callback. However, inside the callback, this no longer refers to my object. Why not?

I’m familiar with using a variable to get around the problem when passing a function literal:

var obj = {
    a: function () {
        var me = this;

        console.log(this);

        setTimeout(function () {
            console.log(this); // Not obj
            console.log(me);   // This works!
        }, 100);
    }
};

How can I fix it in this case?

var obj = {
    b: function () {
        setTimeout(this.callback, 100);
    },
    callback: function () {
        console.log(this); // =(
    }
};
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T21:58:11+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 9:58 pm

    Yes, this can be kind of tricky in Javascript. The problem is that its value depends on how you call the function.

    obj.callback(); //ok
    
    var f = obj.callback;
    f(); //does not look like a method call
         //Javascript does not pass the this!
    

    The usual workaround is passing a wrapper callback like you did in b), except that the common name for the me variable is that (you sometimes see self too)

    var that = this;
    setTimeout( function(){ return that.callback(); }, 300);
    

    The other alternative is to use the bind method from functions

    setTimeout( this.callback.bind(this) , 300)
    

    Note that bind is not supported in IE 8 (you might need a shim in that case).


    For more:

    Maintaining the reference to "this" in Javascript when using callbacks and closures

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a function that takes another function as a parameter. Something like this
I'm creating my own JavaScript Array-like object and I have methods that call closures.
I'd like to be able to call getProgram on objects which have that method,
I have an object with a method that returns a filehandle, and I want
I have a method that can return either a single object or a collection
Suppose I have a method that takes an object of some kind as an
I have a WCF service method that expects an object and then retrieves its
I have a controller method that returns a jSON object and in one calling
Suppose I have a Java method that returns a HashMap object. Because a LinkedHashMap
I have a service method that calls a DAO which then returns an object

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.