Question

I have an old untyped class pre Java1.5 and need to refactor it using Java Generics to get more type security in the code.

Old Code looks like this:

class Foo { 
  void setInput(Object input) {...}
}

Now this input could be some object but it may also be an array, nasty stuff. Making a generic version of it seems not to be trivial, I tried:

class Foo<E> {
  void setInput(E input) {...}
  void setInput(E[] input) {...}
}

The problem is that this is ambiguous for example for calls:

Foo f = Foo<SomeClassyClass>();
f.setInput(null);

Is there some good solution to this problem or do I need to take a completely other approach?

Thanks,
Patrick

Answer 1

This type of ambiguity is not new to generics but can always happen with overloaded methods. You have to cast the null:

Foo<String> f = new Foo<String>();

f.setInput((String[]) null);
f.setInput((String) null);