Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 535809
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T09:45:21+00:00 2026-05-13T09:45:21+00:00

i have an orders table that has a userID column i have a user

  • 0

i have an orders table that has a userID column

i have a user table that has id, name,

i would like to have a database trigger that shows the insert, update or delete by name.

so i wind up having to do this join between these two tables on every single db trigger. I would think it would be better if i can one query upfront to map users to Ids and then reuse that “lookup ” on my triggers . . is this possible?

DECLARE @oldId int
DECLARE @newId int
DECLARE @oldName VARCHAR(100)
DECLARE @newName VARCHAR(100)

SELECT @oldId = (SELECT user_id FROM Deleted)
SELECT @newId = (SELECT user_id FROM Inserted)

SELECT @oldName = (SELECT name FROM users where id = @oldId)
SELECT @newName = (SELECT name FROM users where id = @newId)

  INSERT INTO History(id,  . . . 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T09:45:21+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:45 am

    Good news, you are already are using a cache! Your SELECT name FROM users WHERE id = @id is going to fetch the name for the buffer pool cached pages. Believe you me, you won’t be able to construct a better tuned, higher scale and faster cache than that.

    Result caching may make sense in the client, where one can avoid the roundtrip to the database altogether. Or it may be valuable to cache some complex and long running query result. But inside a stored proc/trigger there is absolutely no value in caching a simple index lookup result.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 279k
  • Answers 279k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer my guess is that you have an old breakpoint used… May 13, 2026 at 3:25 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You probably overloaded Format() with a declaration of the same… May 13, 2026 at 3:25 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you can redeploy to appscale, you won't have to… May 13, 2026 at 3:25 pm

Related Questions

I'm having a table (an existing table with data in it) and that table
Firstly this site is based on guests who are interested in selling their items
I have a table users which has a primary key userid and a datetime
Performance consideration: Spread rows in multiple tables vs concentrate all rows in one table.
We have a query that is currently killing our database and I know there

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.