Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1064779
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T19:43:12+00:00 2026-05-16T19:43:12+00:00

I have another theory question , as the title suggested it’s to evaluate a

  • 0

I have another theory question , as the title suggested it’s to evaluate a build of code. Basically I’m considering using this template everywhere.

I am using VC++ VS2008 (all included)

Stapel.h

class Stapel
{
public:
    //local vars
    int x;

private:
public:
    Stapel();
    Stapel(int value);
    ~Stapel(){}

    //getters setters
    void set_x(int value)
    {
        x = value;
    }

    int get_x(int value)
    {   
        x = value;
    }   

void CleanUp();

private:
};

Stapel.cpp

#include "Stapel.h"

Stapel::Stapel()
{

}

Stapel::Stapel(int value)
{
    set_x(value);
}

void Stapel::CleanUp()
{
    //CleanUpCalls
}

The focal point here is the cleanup method, basically I want to put that method in all my files everywhere , and simply let it do my delete calls when needed to make sure it’s all in one place and I can prevent delete’s from flying around which , as a rookie, even I know is probably not something you want to mess around with nor have a sloppy heap.

What about this build?

Good bad ? why ?

And what about using destructors for such tasks?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T19:43:12+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 7:43 pm

    Boost provides several utilities for RAII-style heap-managment:

    1. Smart pointer (there are several implementations here for different scenarios)
    2. Pointer Containers

    Drawbacks of your proposal:

    1. In your implementation, you still have to remember to place a delete in the CleanUp-method for every heap-allocation you do. Tracking these allocations can be very difficult if your program has any kind of non-linear control flow (some allocations might only happen under certain circumstances). By binding the deallocation of resources (in this case memory) to the lifetime of objects on the stack, you do not have to worry as much. You will still have to consider things like circular references.
    2. RAII helps you write exception-safe code.
    3. In my experience, RAII leads to more structured code. Objects that are only needed inside a certain loop or branch will not be initialized somewhere else, but right inside the block where they are needed. This makes code easier to read and to maintain.

    Edit: A good way to start implementing that is to get Boost. Then search your code for raw pointers, and try to replace every pointer by

    1. A reference
    2. A smart-pointer
    3. A pointer container, if it is a container that owns pointers

    If this is done, your code should not contain any deletes anymore. If you use make_shared, you can even eliminate all news. If you run into any problems that you cannot solve by yourself, check out stackoverflow.com … oh wait, you know that one already 😉

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have code to create another row (div with inputs) on a button click.
I have a value like this: Foo Bar Another Value something else What regex
Put it another way: what code have you written that cannot fail. I'm interested
Hey! I am not trying to push my luck here but I have another
I'm developing a Linux driver loadable module and I have to use another device
I have a situation where another developer is including source files from a project
I have a ListView inside another ListView, and I'd like to hide a table
I have a Java application that launches another java application. The launcher has a
I have an application that writes to another application and needs to provide the
I have a Form being launched from another form on a different thread. Most

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.