Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3799128
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T13:41:02+00:00 2026-05-19T13:41:02+00:00

I have been asked a question in an interview about interfaces. I am not

  • 0

I have been asked a question in an interview about interfaces. I am not sure whether it’s really possible. Please see the question below.

There are 3 interfaces A, B, and C. A inherits from interfaces B and C:

public interface A : B,C
{

} 

We have to make sure that users of this interfaces can’t use B and C directly or independently and have to use only A.

I could think of the following scenarios:

  1. Make B and C inner interfaces. But I don’t see any real use as I could directly define all the members in A itself.
  2. Make B and C private interfaces. But how can I make it? Also, I have seen at the below MSDN link that B and C have to be at least as accessible as A: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa664578%28v=VS.71%29.aspx.

Is there any way to do this or is the question itself wrong?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T13:41:03+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 1:41 pm

    What you are asking for would be a violation of the Liskov Substitution Principle.

    If A implements B this way, it should always be usable directly as a B. Trying to prevent this would be violating one of the main precepts of object oriented design.

    I suspect the interviewer was trying to see if you understood this core concept, and would say “This is wrong because …” right from the start.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.