Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7907707
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T11:35:29+00:00 2026-06-03T11:35:29+00:00

I have been learning about collision in phisics programming , and i have one

  • 0

I have been learning about collision in phisics programming , and i have one big doubt.

Thinking in spheres , when one sphere collision with 2 at the same time, i thought that the forces magnitude that makes the boths spheres move , must be divided by 2 . But when i’m programming it , i always see that one sphere has more speed than the second , cause the way im programming it it collision first with one that with the another . Let’s show an image to draw clearly the problem:

enter image description here

At first it detect the red sphere .
Then the collision is detected , and the force magnitude is like there was only one sphere.
Then it detects orange sphere , and the force magnitude is less than first one.

Any idea of what must i use to programm this ,or if i’m having any missconception?

mod:

Furthermore , if you help me searching for a mechanism that makes this happen nicely i would give you 50+ more .

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T11:35:30+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 11:35 am

    The problem is that for a two body collision, conservation of energy and momentum are basically sufficient for determining the outcome, but for a three body problem this is no longer the case. Even if you do do what Mark and Daren suggest, and determine all colliding bodies within a timestep, it doesn’t really get you anywhere, because 1) you still won’t know how to move the objects after the collision; and 2) the primary question in how many objects to consider during each collision isn’t the timestep but the deformation of the objects, and if you treat this correctly the sequence of updating within a timestep wont matter. For example, if you have very soft objects, they will probably be in contact for many timesteps, and very hard objects only a few timesteps.

    A good answer to this problem is a bit tricky, and the reason for this is contained in your bonus question, that is, what’s the mechanism. The mechanism is basically just the things you’re not considering in your simplified problem: deformation of the objects, slip, rotation, etc, but these will generally be dominant issues in three body collision.

    What you do depends entirely on how much accuracy you need. You could just pretend that all collisions are either between two objects, or a third hitting two is always exactly symmetric (which is a very rare event). As a more accurate start you could just consider that they are deformable objects, assume that each collision has a moment in time when everything is maximally deformed, and what are the forces that result from these deformations, and send things off based on these forces (F=dp/dt). Other approximations could be made though, say just dividing up the momentum transfer based on which one is hit first, and give this an amount proportional do (the amount of deformation)/(the distance to the next object), or some such thing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have been learning about various functional languages for some time now including Haskell,
I have been learning about TDD (using JUnit) and I have a doubt about
I have been neglecting learning about caching for quite some time now, and although
Recently I have been learning about WMI and WQL. I found out the list
I have been learning the Definitive Guide of JavaScript.i got a question about the
I am currently learning about basic networking in java. I have been playing around
I've been learning wpf for about a week now.. and i have a basic
I have been learning python for some time now. While starting this learning python
I have recently been learning more about design patterns and thought I'd take a
I'm 14 and have been learning java for about 4/5 months. I'm coding a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.