Home/ Questions/Q 988139
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-16T05:35:49+00:00

I have been looking at a HTML 5 boilerplate template (from http://html5boilerplate.com/ ) and

  • 0

I have been looking at a HTML 5 boilerplate template (from http://html5boilerplate.com/) and noticed the use of "?v=1" in URLs when referring to CSS and JavaScript files.

  1. What does appending "?v=1" to CSS and JavaScript URLs in link and script tags do?
  2. Not all JavaScript URLs have the "?v=1" (example from the sample below: js/modernizr-1.5.min.js). Is there a reason why this is the case?

Sample from their index.html:

<!-- CSS : implied media="all" -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/style.css?v=1">

<!-- For the less-enabled mobile browsers like Opera Mini -->
<link rel="stylesheet" media="handheld" href="css/handheld.css?v=1">

<!-- All JavaScript at the bottom, except for Modernizr which enables HTML5 elements & feature detects -->
<script src="js/modernizr-1.5.min.js"></script>

<!------ Some lines removed ------>

<script src="js/plugins.js?v=1"></script>
<script src="js/script.js?v=1"></script>

<!--[if lt IE 7 ]>
  <script src="js/dd_belatedpng.js?v=1"></script>
<![endif]-->


<!-- yui profiler and profileviewer - remove for production -->
<script src="js/profiling/yahoo-profiling.min.js?v=1"></script>
<script src="js/profiling/config.js?v=1"></script>
<!-- end profiling code -->
Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    These are usually to make sure that the browser gets a new version when the site gets updated with a new version, e.g. as part of our build process we’d have something like this:

    /Resources/Combined.css?v=x.x.x.buildnumber

    Since this changes with every new code push, the client’s forced to grab a new version, just because of the querystring. Look at this page (at the time of this answer) for example:

    <link ... href="http://sstatic.net/stackoverflow/all.css?v=c298c7f8233d">

    I think instead of a revision number the SO team went with a file hash, which is an even better approach, even with a new release, the browsers only forced to grab a new version when the file actually changes.

    Both of these approaches allow you to set the cache header to something ridiculously long, say 20 years…yet when it changes, you don’t have to worry about that cache header, the browser sees a different querystring and treats it as a different, new file.

    • 0