Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5990209
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T23:12:38+00:00 2026-05-22T23:12:38+00:00

I have been looking for this pattern for some time but still did not

  • 0

I have been looking for this pattern for some time but still did not get very good way of representing this .

Consider a GUI design which needs to show attributes of an object based on version , these versions specify which attributes makes sense to a client . (say the client has details of supported versions )

The GUI layout need to change based on the version of this object . For example for certain versions we want to show additional menus etc. For some we want to change the ordering of the attributes etc.

For the above condition is there any pattern which defines how to represent the classes ?

Currently the way we do is to have a check for versioning for these but its getting out of control , so i am looking for a solution which allows us to share the common code and also keep the version specific code separate so that we can maintain it . And changes to a version localized .

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T23:12:38+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 11:12 pm

    I would extract shared functionality out into another object and have them composed inside your actual class.

    For example, if the class is A, you would do CommonA and have A_1 contain an object of CommonA and A_2 contain an object of CommonA as well. Here A_1 and A_2 represent version 1 and version 2.

    Both A_1 and A_2 expose the same methods and internally delegate to the shared class.

    This way you are not duplicating and you localize your version specific stuff inside each of A_1, A_2 etc.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.