Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5847639
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T12:44:48+00:00 2026-05-22T12:44:48+00:00

I have been playing around with GIT on my local computer. As I have

  • 0

I have been playing around with GIT on my local computer.

As I have gain a bit of knowledge using GIT like add, commit, merge, branch, checkout, status.

I still have more to learn but im confuse one thing.. how does git handle team?

For example:

  • Developer A computer
  • Developer B computer
  • Developer C computer
  • Central repository (Server)

All Developers working on the same project.

From what I understood (correct me if im wrong).. A ,B and C developers push their branch (master?) to central repository via SSH remote.

But on the central repository, how do I get information or which files (or branch?) that has been pushed from the developers… What would it look like on the central repository?

On the central repository, how would handle merges developers work?

Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T12:44:49+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 12:44 pm

    There is no “central repository”, per se. You will typically create one because it works out nicely for working in a team and keeping everything/everyone organized.

    When setting up this central repository, you will give it a name of some sort. This is your local reference point to this central repository, not everyone on your team has to necessarily call it the same thing. This is a ‘remote’ in git (and I’m sure many other DVCSs) speak. Most people tend to name it ‘origin’. You can find out what branches have been pushed to the origin (and more, such as tags) by doing a git fetch origin. When doing a git pull, you are really doing a git fetch, followed by a git merge.

    From what I understood (correct me if im wrong).. A ,B and C developers push their branch (master?) to central repository via SSH remote.

    It doesn’t necessarily have to be master. Just like origin, master is a naming convention and happens to be the branch that gets created for you when you initialize a directory as being a git repository.

    But on the central repository, how do I get information or which files (or branch?) that has been pushed from the developers… What would it look like on the central repository?

    See above re: git fetch.

    On the central repository, how would handle merges developers work?

    You don’t have to handle merges on the origin because a developer will have to pull the latest work from everyone else on whatever branch they are working on, before they can push their changes to the origin (and in particular, that branch).

    I hope this helps. I am far from understanding all of the ins-and-outs of how it all really works.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have been playing around with git on my local machine and everything makes
I have been playing around with the merge command in R and am trying
so I have been playing around with django for a bit and I really
I have been playing around with D 2.0 a bit today mostly because of
I've been playing around with asp.net MVC3 a bit and have been struggling to
I have been playing around with the postgresql.conf file for a couple days now.
I have been playing around with the EF to see what it can handle.
I have been working with PostgreSQL, playing around with Wikipedia's millions of hyperlinks and
I've been playing around with Git recently to get a grasp of distributed version
Have been playing around with linq but there is one thing I cant seem

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.