Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I have been reading about JPA and EJB3 and would like to confirm that my understanding of their relationship is correct. Here’s what I think I know…
JPA is a specification that has been implemented by a number of vendors including:
EJB3 is a specification that is implemented in Application Servers including:
Is this correct?
The Java Persistence API introduced in Java EE 5 is a subset of EJB 3 and replaces the persistence solution of EJB 2.0 CMP. JPA 1.0 has been defined as part of the EJB 3.0 specification (JSR 220) but can be used without and outside an EJB container. In Java EE 6, JPA 2.0 has its separate specification (JSR 317), outside the EJB 3.1 specification (JSR 318). So to summarize:
JPA is a subset of EJB 3 and implementations are provided by persistence providers like Toplink Essentials / EclipseLink, Hibernate, Kodo / OpenJPA (Kodo is the project from which the OpenJPA source code was derived and Kodo is now, in turn, based on OpenJPA), etc.
EJB 3 is a wider specification and implementations are provided by the EJB container of application servers that rely on persistence providers: