Question

I have been thinking the design over for a couple days now and I’m asymptotically 100% sure this is a design problem. However, here’s my predicament: I essentially want to have a compiler checked and polymorphic static classes. Specifically, I have this:

static class TileSettings
{
    static class TileOne
    {
        public const TileType TYPE = TileType.TileOne;
    }

    static class TileTwo
    {
        public const TileType TYPE = TileType.TileTwo;
    }
}

This seems fine but I would like to have the subclasses to follow a contract (like an interface) that TileOne and TileTwo could follow so that somewhere in code I could do something like the following:

public void function(TileSettings SETTINGS_TO_USE)
{
    someLocalVariable = SETTINGS_TO_USE.TYPE;
}

function(TileOne);
function(TileTwo);

One major problem that sticks out to me though is that one can’t pass a static class into a function. What I could do is have a static class with methods that take a TileType and use a switch to return that types value. That seems like it would be highly inefficient, however, if it ends up being called a lot. So, any thoughts? Is there something simple I’m unaware of that would solve this? Thanks in advance for any help.

Answer 1

Yes, the answer is: don’t use a static class.

How about this:

class TileSettings
{
    public readonly TileType TYPE;

    public static readonly TileSettings TileOne = new TileSettings(TileType.TileOne);
    public static readonly TileSettings TileTwo = new TileSettings(TileType.TileTwo);

    public TileSettings(TileType type)
    {
         TYPE = type;
    }
}

You can use it like this then:

public void function(TileSettings settings)
{
    someLocalVariable = settings;
}

function(TileSettings.TileOne);
function(TileSettings.TileTwo);