Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6875361
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T04:18:46+00:00 2026-05-27T04:18:46+00:00

I have been using a variadic template that acts as an exception firewall in

  • 0

I have been using a variadic template that acts as an exception firewall in an interface between C and C++. The template simply takes a function, followed by N arguments and calls the function inside a try catch block. This has been working fine, unfortunately one of the functions I wish to call now takes an additional default argument. As a result the function name is not resolved and the template fails to compile.

The error is:

perfect-forward.cpp: In function ‘void FuncCaller(Func, Args&& ...) [with Func = void (*)(const std::basic_string<char>&, double, const std::vector<int>&), Args = {const char (&)[7], double}]’:
perfect-forward.cpp:69:41: instantiated from here
perfect-forward.cpp:46:4: error: too few arguments to function

A simplified version of the code is as follows:

template< class Func, typename ...Args >
void FuncCaller( Func f, Args&&... params )
{
   try
   {
       cout << __func__ << " called\n";
       f(params...);
   }
   catch( std::exception& ex )
   {
       cout << "Caught exception: " << ex.what() << "\n";
   }
}

void Callee( const string& arg1, double d, const vector<int>&v = vector<int>{} )
{
   cout << __func__ << " called\n";
   cout << "\targ1: " << arg1 << "\n";
   cout << "\td: " << d << "\n";
   cout << "\tv: ";
   copy( v.begin(), v.end(), ostream_iterator<int>( cout, " "  ) );
   cout << "\n";
}

int main()
{
   vector<int> v { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };

   FuncCaller( Callee, "string", 3.1415, v );
   FuncCaller( Callee, "string", 3.1415 );  **// Fails to compile**

   return 0;
} 

Should this code work or am I expecting too much from the compiler?

Note: I have tested the use of perfect forwarding with constructors that have default arguments and the code compiles and works as expected,

i.e.:

template<typename TypeToConstruct> struct SharedPtrAllocator 
{
    template<typename ...Args> shared_ptr<TypeToConstruct> 
        construct_with_shared_ptr(Args&&... params) {
        return std::shared_ptr<TypeToConstruct>(new TypeToConstruct(std::forward<Args>(params)...));
    };
};

works when calling the cfollowing constructor with 2 or 3 arguments…

MyClass1( const string& arg1, double d, const vector<int>&v = vector<int>{} )
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T04:18:46+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 4:18 am

    I don’t think there’s any way this can be achieved. The default argument values are not part of the function signature. They’re only code-generation short-hands that are expanded by the compiler when you call the function literally. Similarly, std::bind won’t pick up default arguments, either.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have been using this function for a while without a problem, although I
I have been using so many 3rd party libraries(jar files) that my CLASSPATH is
We have been using CruiseControl for quite a while with NUnit and NAnt. For
I have been using PHP and JavaScript for building my dad's website. He wants
I have been using Eclipse as an IDE for a short amount of time
I have been using Castle MonoRail for the last two years, but in a
We have been using Scrum for around 9 months and it has largely been
I have been using C# for a while now, and going back to C++
I have been using ASP.NET for years, but I can never remember when using
I have been using Ruby for a while now and I find, for bigger

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.