Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 607959
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T17:24:49+00:00 2026-05-13T17:24:49+00:00

I have been working to deploy a relatively large Rails app (Rails 2.3.5) and

  • 0

I have been working to deploy a relatively large Rails app (Rails 2.3.5) and recently doing some load testing we discovered that the throughput for the site is way below the expected level of traffic.

We were running on a standard 32bit server, 3GB of RAM with Centos, and we were running Ruby Enterprise Edition (latest build), Passenger (Latest build) and Nginx (Latest build) – when there is only one or two users the site runs fine (as you would expect) however when we try to ramp up the load to ~50 concurrent requests it completely dies. (Apache Bench report ~2.3 req/sec, which is terrible)

We are running RPM and trying to determine where the load issue is, but it’s pretty evenly distributed across Rails, SQL and Memcached, so we’re more or less going through and optimizing the codebase.

Out of sheer desperation we spun up a large EC2 instance (Ubuntu 9.10, 7.5GB RAM, 2 Compute Units/Cores) and setup the same configuration as the original server, and while there are more resources we were still seeing pathetic results.

So, after spending too much time trying to optimize, playing with caching configuration etc I decided to test the throughput of some mongrels, and ta-da, they are performing much much better then Passenger.

Currently the configuration is 15x Mongrels being proxied via Nginx, and we seem to be meeting our load requirements just but it’s not quite enough to make me comfortable with going live… What I was wondering is if anyone knows of some possible causes for this…?

My configuration for passenger/nginx was:

  • Nginx workers: tried between 1 and 10, usually three though.
  • Passenger max pool size: 10 – 30 (yes, these numbers are quite high)
  • Passenger global queueing: tried both on and off.
  • NGinx GZip on: yes

It might pay to note that we had increased the nginx max client body size to 200m to allow for large file uploads.

Anyway suggestions would be really appreciated, while the mongrels are working fine it changes how we do things a lot and I would really prefer to use Passenger – besides, wasn’t it supposed to make this easier and perform better?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T17:24:49+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 5:24 pm

    Maybe your sql pool size is too small? This essentially limits the parallelism of database workloads in your application which in turn builds up to much increased load as soon as you put work on your app stack…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have been working on some legacy C++ code that uses variable length structures
I have been working with a string[] array in C# that gets returned from
I have been working with relational databases for sometime, but it only recently occurred
I have been working with Struts for some time, but for a project I
I have been working on a wrapper for a COM object that can only
I have been working on a web services related project for about the last
I have been working with Visual Studio (WinForm and ASP.NET applications using mostly C#)
We have been working with CVS for years, and frequently find it useful to
I have been working as a native C++ programmer for last few years. Now
I have been working on a childish little program: there are a bunch of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.