Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 706919
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T04:13:10+00:00 2026-05-14T04:13:10+00:00

I have class Foo(): function bar(): pass function foobar(): pass Rather than executing each

  • 0

I have

class Foo():
    function bar():
        pass

    function foobar():
        pass

Rather than executing each function one by one as follows:

x = Foo()
x.bar()
x.foobar()

is there a built-in way to loop through and execute each function in the sequence in which they are written in the class?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T04:13:11+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 4:13 am

    No. You can access Foo.__dict__, and call each value in turn (catching errors for non-callable members), but the order is not preserved.

    for callable in Foo.__dict__.values():
        try:
            callable()    
        except TypeError:
            pass
    

    This assumes none of the functions take parameters, as in your example.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 502k
  • Answers 502k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Whenever i see that, it tends to mean that the… May 16, 2026 at 2:36 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The newline found by fgets() is kept in 'pword'. Remove… May 16, 2026 at 2:36 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Nooo, why like that? Use callback! First hide level3, and… May 16, 2026 at 2:36 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

Is following code legal C++ or not? class Foo { class Bar; void HaveADrink(Bar
So if I am iterating using a foreach loop and I have a function
I have a set of static class methods. I also have an existing database
I have a linked list structure: struct SomeLinkedList { const char* bar; int lots_of_interesting_stuff_in_here;
I have some code in a reusable class that modifies some types. Here's a
Ok I have some code that boils down to a pattern like this class
I have a class which has a constructor that takes a const char* .
This is a little contrived, but say I have a class interface like this:
in PHP 5 it would be class Example { private $foo = old data;
I have a bunch of overloaded functions that operate on certain data types such

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.