Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3458122
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T09:56:39+00:00 2026-05-18T09:56:39+00:00

I have class that holds Tree Items for a Tree. Say the constructor looks

  • 0

I have class that holds Tree Items for a Tree. Say the constructor looks like this ViewTreeItem(List item) and can be called like this

for( List l : model.getLists() )
    getTree().add( new ViewTreeItem(l) );

My controller ControllerTreeItem uses the List item reference to modify the list directly instead of calling to model to do the work.

Is this OK to change the model in this way? If not how might I do it in an alternative way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T09:56:40+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:56 am

    the whole point of MVC is to make the design flexible. i think it would probably be better to have a method in the model which you can use to modify the list instead of modifying directly, as this would negate the whole point of using the MVC pattern.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a specialized list that holds items of type IThing : public class
I have a class that looks like this public class SomeClass { public SomeChildClass[]
I have class method that returns a list of employees that I can iterate
I have a simple class that essentially just holds some values. I have overridden
I have a class that I want to use to store properties for another
I have a class that map objects to objects, but unlike dictionary it maps
I have a class that I wish to expose as a remote service using
I have a class that creates several IDisposable objects, all of these objects are
I have a class that encapsulates tcp socket communications with a server. For each
I have a class that processes a 2 xml files and produces a text

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.