Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7732411
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T06:43:26+00:00 2026-06-01T06:43:26+00:00

I have class World which manages creation of object… After creation it calls afterCreation

  • 0

I have class World which manages creation of object… After creation it calls afterCreation method and I the created object is user-defined type derived from Entity (eg. MyEntity), I want to call addEntity. I the object was something else, I want to do nothing.
addEntity must be called with appropriate T, because it generates unique IDs for every derived class etc.

Here is my solution:

template <int v>
struct ToType
{
    enum { value = v };
};

template <typename T>
void World::afterCreation(T * t)
{
    afterCreation(t, ToType<std::is_base_of<Entity, T>::value>());
}

template <typename T>
void World::afterCreation(T * t, ToType<true>)
{
    addEntity(t); //here I cant pass Entity *, I need the real type, eg. MyEntity
}

template <typename T>
void World::afterCreation(T * t, ToType<false>)
{

}

My question is – Can in be done better way?

How can I simulate following code without ToType or similar?

template <typename T>
void afterCreation(){/*generic impl*/}

template <typename T where T is derived from Entity>
void afterCreation(){/*some specific stuff*/}
  • “specialize” in the title is only to describe my intention, no need to solve problem with template specialization
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T06:43:28+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 6:43 am

    It is not going to make it much better, but you can remove one level of indirection by using SFINAE:

    template <typename T>
    typename std::enable_if< std::is_base_of<Entity, T>::value >::type
     World::afterCreation(T * t)
    {
       // Derived from Entity
    }
    template <typename T>
    typename std::enable_if< !std::is_base_of<Entity, T>::value >::type
     World::afterCreation(T * t)
    {
       // generic
    }
    

    How does this work? When the compiler finds the call to afterCreation it tries to determine which of the overloads is best, and for that it matches the types and tries to perform the substitution. In both cases, the matched type (from the arguments) and apply the substitution to the whole expression. The enable_if template contains an inner type type if the value passed as the first argument is true or else it does not contain such type. During the substitution of the types, one of the overloads will yield an invalid function signature (the one for which the condition is false) and will be dropped from the set of candidates.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm using Rails 2.3 and I have 3 tables, which manages user permissions to
I have an .fla that links to a generic Document class which manages the
I have a class LocationHelper which I am designing to obtain a user location.
I have a class that manages user preferences for a large software project. Any
I have a class which would create a bean and the bean has few
I have this class which i would like to map: public class Contract {
I have a container class which I would like to use to print all
I would like to have a class B which can be extended with two
I have a class which is in charge for error handling. I would like
I have a class which is intended for immutable use, hence I would like

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.