Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8126725
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T07:15:13+00:00 2026-06-06T07:15:13+00:00

I have classes A, B and C. A has members B and C. C

  • 0

I have classes A, B and C.

A has members B and C.

C has data B wants to access.

I’m thinking of doing something like this, and would like to ask whether or not this is good design.

class A{
B* m_b;
C* m_c;
};

class B{
A* m_a; // so that i can get access to C->m_data
};

class C{
vector<Obj*> m_data;
}

How would you design class B?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T07:15:15+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 7:15 am

    Circular pointers are almost always a bad idea. You probably don’t need access to C->m_data from the entire class B; just pass it as an argument to the B methods that need to see it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a data access library that has a few classes that all implement
I have a class which has two HashSet<String> collections as private members. Other classes
I have two classes, Car and Person. Car has as one of its members
Assume I have classes A1 and A2 and a class B that has elements
I have 3 abstract classes (Customer, Tender, Site). For Customer has inherited class such
I have a .NET assembly that has tens of classes and methods which are
I have a constructor that has a series of classes and functions within it
i have an android project which has a lot of classes I've built. i
I have an ntier solution which has a Domain project for my POCO classes.
I have created a project that uses scala that has some abstract classes definitions

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.