Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7532269
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T05:24:09+00:00 2026-05-30T05:24:09+00:00

I have code that basically looks like this (it isn’t actually object, but rather

  • 0

I have code that basically looks like this (it isn’t actually object, but rather a custom class):

object thing
try {
  thing = new object();
    ......

} catch { stuff }
finally {
  if (thing != null) { some clean up code }

But VS is not letting me do this because it says I am referencing an unassigned variable. I am well aware it could be unassigned when this code is run, which is why the null check is there. I don’t want to instantiate the object outside of the try block because it does a fair bit and could throw an exception, and I would prefer against wrapping the whole thing in another try/catch block just so I can instantiate it up there. Is there something else I can do?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T05:24:10+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 5:24 am

    “Unassigned” isn’t the same as “null”. Your code is simply invalid – you need to fix it.

    It’s very easy here – just initialize the variable to null to start with:

    object thing = null;
    

    Now it will definitely have a value (a null reference) so you’re allowed to read from it in the finally block.

    The point is that local variables cannot be read before the point at which the compiler can prove that a value (whether null or not) has definitely been assigned. Effectively, local variables don’t have “default values”.

    (Mind you, I’d normally use IDisposable for clean-up code, along with a using statement.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have code that looks like this: template<class T> class list { public: class
Basically I have code which looks like this inside a header file: class Bar;
I'm using symfony 1.4.8 and I have some code that basically looks like this
I have some code that looks like this: int i = 0; foreach (var
I have a table that looks basically like this: id | redirectid | data
I frequently have code that looks something like this: if (itm != null) {
I have a block of code that basically intializes several classes, but they are
I have code that looks like the following, which works fine for displaying the
I have code that looks like: //System.Data.IDataRecord dr try { Consolidated = Utility.NullConvert.ToBool(dr[Constants.Data.Columns.cConsolidated], false);
I have code that I want to look like this: List<Type> Os; ... foreach

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.