Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7719567
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T03:26:54+00:00 2026-06-01T03:26:54+00:00

I have code that is triggered on launch only after the app is upgraded

  • 0

I have code that is triggered on launch only after the app is upgraded or installed. I want to debug this code, but can’t think of a way to do it.

I can’t launch the app with Xcode because it would overwrite the existing app and wouldn’t trigger the update.

I can’t attach Xcode to the process manually because the code I want to debug will have executed by the time I get Xcode attached.

Is there someway of pulling this off that I’m missing?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T03:26:55+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 3:26 am

    Use the “Wait for MyApp.app to launch” option.

    In Xcode, hold down the Option key and choose Product->Run… (the ellipses are added when you hold Option down). This will bring up the scheme editor, with the Run scheme selected. Click on the Info tab, and on the resulting Info panel you’ll see a radio group labelled “Launch” with two options: “Automatically” and “Wait for MyApp.app to launch”. If you select the second option, Xcode will start the debugger and wait for you to launch your application manually. You can set a breakpoint at the beginning of the code you want to debug, and the debugger will stop there.

    Reset the app to its previous state.

    You may want to consider adding some code that resets the app to whatever state it was in before the upgrade. This can be debug code that’s excluded from the release build. Debugging problems that require you to re-install the app every time you want to run through your debug can take a lot of time. Even just having to restart the app at every debug cycle eats up a lot of your time. It’s very often worthwhile to spend a little extra time adding a button to your app that undoes whatever changes you’re making so that you can do them again.

    Unit test.

    One great way to debug code that deals with app states that are difficult to recreate is to write unit tests. In a test, you can create any state you want. You can even create app states that may be impossible to recreate in your app. And you can debug that code over and over again. Like the previous solution, it takes a little more time to write the code up front, but you’ll save so much time on each iteration of your debug cycle that its well worth it. Even better, you can add the test to your build process so to help ensure that the functionality doesn’t break later.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have code that I want to look like this: List<Type> Os; ... foreach
I have code that I want to compile on all unix systems, but if
I have code that looks like this: template<class T> class list { public: class
I have code that uses jquery.slideup and jquery.slidedown How can i know that div
I have code that references a web service, and I'd like the address of
I have code that looks like the following, which works fine for displaying the
I have code that looks like: //System.Data.IDataRecord dr try { Consolidated = Utility.NullConvert.ToBool(dr[Constants.Data.Columns.cConsolidated], false);
I have code that uses Win API function RegSaveKeyEx to save registry entries to
I have code that calls an ENTRY in a SUBROUTINE before the SUBROUTINE .
I have some code that adds mouseover events and mouseout events to all 'a'

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.