Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3238990
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T17:55:03+00:00 2026-05-17T17:55:03+00:00

I have code that uses MoQ to create a partial stub. I’d prefer to

  • 0

I have code that uses MoQ to create a partial stub. I’d prefer to interact with the interface instead of the concrete implementation so that I won’t have to modify the unit test if I have a different implementation of the interface.

So for example, I have a factory method such as:

private Mock<ISomeInterface> ISomeInterfaceStubFactory()
{
    return new Mock<SomeConcreteImplementation>();
}

Here is the code that calls the method:

var partialStub = ISomeInterfaceStubFactory();            
partialStub.Setup(m => m.MethodToStubOutThatMethodToTestCalls(It.IsAny<string>())).Returns(new List<SomeOtherObject>());
partialStub.CallBase = true;

var actualResult= partialStub.Object.MethodToTest();

Assert.That(actualResult, Is.EqualTo(expectedResult));

The problem is that when doing this is that ISomeInterfaceStubFactory won’t compile. So I changed it to be like below, but doing this seems to break the partial stub. The actual implemented MethodToStubOutThatMethodToTestCalls operation gets called, not the stubbed version. Basically I’m trying to use polymorphism with the stub object. Is there anyway to do this? I’d like my unit test to not be highly coupled to the concrete implementation.

private Mock<ISomeInterface> ISomeInterfaceStubFactory()
{
    return new Mock<SomeConcreteImplementation>.As<ISomeInterface>();
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T17:55:04+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 5:55 pm

    I think you are missing the point of mock objects. Returning a mock from a concrete implementation makes no sense. The idea is to have the class under test depend on some interface or abstract which you could mock.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some code that uses the shared gateway pattern to implement an inversion
I have some code that uses the Oracle function add_months to increment a Date
I have some Java code that uses curly braces in two ways // Curly
I have seen C# code that uses the @ to tell the compiler the
I have some c(++) code that uses sprintf to convert a uint_64 to a
I have some old python code that uses the pywin32 extensions. Starting out with
I have some e-commerce code that I use often that uses Linq To SQL
I have been working on some legacy C++ code that uses variable length structures
I have this long and complex source code that uses a RNG with a
I have seen sample source code around that uses different ways of releasing/dealloc'ing objects,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.